Admin: Handled, thank you.Originally Posted by gotap_d
Admin: Handled, thank you.
S_B unable to remember now why I put George's Rabbit in the narrative on Schnatterly's Rabbit. The onlines pedigree site shows two Schnatterly's Rabbitt pedigrees as the same with one having a POR status.
The George's Rabbit shows the pedigree you have shown. So may be two different dogs. I did not look to see if the siblings off both dogs on that site were the exact same. Sadly SDJ info may not always be correct as well, depending who gave the info. Sometimes dog men who are active do not even wish to have anything about their shows or pedigrees put in a magazine. Many times is a fellow dog man or owner of dogs off a particular dog. Not saying this is the case here.
Schnatterly's Rabbitt has 5 off spring on this site. Can not fix anything at the moment. On lines pedigree is the only reference pedigree site available to me. If I see one certain dog listed more than one time. If two or three of the pedigrees or more agree with each other, that is the one I go with. Cheers
S_B I went back and checked, should have before I did all this extra posting. George's Rabbit has no off spring shown on the on line's pedigree site. Best leave it as is over there. I need to or Jack can go back on Schnatterly's pedigree and remove that AKA George's Rabbit in the narrative. The sibling's listed bred off Schnatterly's Rabbit bitch, I believe are the most correct. Were some of the dogs those N.C. dog men were crossing up back then. Later some of these dogs were crossed into the Powell's Termite line and some of the Cottingham dogs etc. All of these dog men were trading and breeding dogs back and forth. Cheers
CYJ,
I'm still not sure which Rabbit is correct
More digging on our part maybe or someone with first hand knowledge will chime in.
S_B
The way I see it, George's rabbit is a incomplete pedigree with no siblings. Shnatterly's Rabbit has two pedigrees that agree and five siblings that I know was how those breedings were being put together. Was my error by putting AKA George's Rabbit in the narrative of the Shnatterly's Rabbit.
Best to go with the predominance of the over all evidence that agrees. Same goes for Creel's Gator and Kirkland's Gator. Appers they are two different dogs. Yet both dogs for the time being have been given the same pedigree.
On the onlines pedigree site, Creel's Gator has it's correct pedigree. In some of the other Kirkland pedigrees where you have Creel's Gator listed. Same pedigree is shown. Plus I never saw any Creel dogs with a pedigree as shown on the CH Kirkland's Gator dog. So best go with the majority of pedigrees that agree with each other. Unless one know 100% other wise.
To add insult to injury, even then some pedigrees that do appear to be 100% correct. Are still made up or falsified. I have seen a few pedigrees showing dogs direct out of Carver's Iron head in the first and second generation or some of those Eli dogs or Boomerang dogs having been dead a generation before these pups were born. LOL We just have to do the best with what we have to work with. Cheers
Agreed
http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...p?dog_id=43773
Add photo please
http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...p?dog_id=42794
Name needs updating should be Guerreros' Cascudo 2xw
Source: El Joyero
Actually several punctuation errors in that ped top and bottom.
FIXED!http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...p?dog_id=42794
Name needs updating should be Guerreros' Cascudo 2xw
Source: El Joyero
Actually several punctuation errors in that ped top and bottom.
Many times, when I try to see a ped I get this message " You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'AND fav_userid=174' at line 1 "
Something wrong with my pc or whatever or is it something else?
It always happens when I see a ped and from there I click on ancestors.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote