POSTING DOG FIGHT VIDEOS

[No Quarter Kennel]

Prior to '76, dogfighting was legal. Ask yourself, why is it ILLEGAL now?

You guys in Europe continue "putting it out there" as you are now, and it will one day be ILLEGAL there as well.

Now that it is ILLEGAL, I say no way in hell do we post videos. It will only bring unwanted attention that will take something good like this away. You can take it to the supreme court, win and all that good stuff, but the distraction, cost and casualties that come with that win are extreme. People will vanish from this board b/c of the "heat". You yourself Jack, will be so tied down to winning that this site and everything else in your life will suffer.

Quite simply put, it is not worth it. Let's not look at what it could cost, but rather, what in the hell do we have to gain by posting these videos?

[SGC]

Prior to '76, dogfighting was legal. Ask yourself, why is it ILLEGAL now?

You guys in Europe continue "putting it out there" as you are now, and it will one day be ILLEGAL there as well.

Now that it is ILLEGAL, I say no way in hell do we post videos. It will only bring unwanted attention that will take something good like this away. You can take it to the supreme court, win and all that good stuff, but the distraction, cost and casualties that come with that win are extreme. People will vanish from this board b/c of the "heat". You yourself Jack, will be so tied down to winning that this site and everything else in your life will suffer.

Quite simply put, it is not worth it. Let's not look at what it could cost, but rather, what in the hell do we have to gain by posting these videos?

Excellent post!

Much as I am for free speech, I would have to agree and vote No because of where it could lead.

Yes, Bob Stevens won his case but how many years and how much did it cost him?

The ones that hate this breed of dog have deep pockets and it is hard to fight them. And there are many who hate the pit bull breed.

The HSUS is number one but has anyone looked at some of the other sites? Such as Craven Desires, Dogs Bite, Truth about Pit Bulls, Americas Dog, and many more. I rarely look at such negative sites but one should know one's enemy.

No, better to fly under the radar and keep such things off a forum. Maybe some sort of private section for certain members with a password that changes every month but even that is really not worth the risk.

So sadly, I would have to vote against the videos, even thought they are not illegal as such, they can lead to larger problems.

[Abe]

+1

Excellent post!

Much as I am for free speech, I would have to agree and vote No because of where it could lead.

Yes, Bob Stevens won his case but how many years and how much did it cost him?

The ones that hate this breed of dog have deep pockets and it is hard to fight them. And there are many who hate the pit bull breed.

The HSUS is number one but has anyone looked at some of the other sites? Such as Craven Desires, Dogs Bite, Truth about Pit Bulls, Americas Dog, and many more. I rarely look at such negative sites but one should know one's enemy.

No, better to fly under the radar and keep such things off a forum. Maybe some sort of private section for certain members with a password that changes every month but even that is really not worth the risk.

So sadly, I would have to vote against the videos, even thought they are not illegal as such, they can lead to larger problems.

[Apache]

that craven woman and her multiple personalities used to send me fake friend requests on facebook.
i voted yes for selfish reasons but don't do it, jack. it is an invitation to hell.

[NightBreed]

It would be nice to see some of these so called bad ass killers go, but it would bring a whole lot of heat, I have some shows i was at overseas ( where its legal) i would like to post but this is a mainly american site and its not good for the breed or the dogmen.. Most of the famous shows from 10 plus yrs back or so are on tape ex gr ch banjo, tornado, lukane etc..