Its dumb speculating which dog was better.
Yes it would be nice, as allot of IF's
Its dumb speculating which dog was better.
Yes it would be nice, as allot of IF's
Ultimately, I agree, there's no way to win a debate on who would prevail if any two dogs met.Originally Posted by Nut
Its dumb speculating which dog was better.
Yes it would be nice, as allot of IF's
However, it generates interesting discussion/observation, if the people involved can cite tangible reasons to back up their beliefs.
My thoughts are simply this: Very, very few dogs make it passed 3 fights.
The jump between 3 and 4xW is huge ... and the chasm between 4xW and 5xW creates more fallout still.
Most people stop at 5xW, IF they get a dog that far, and hang it up.
Going from 5x to 6x, and 6x to 7x, is almost unheard of, with the % fallout being greater still.
Therefore, to compare "the quality" a bitch who only won 4 (which is a relatively easy thing to do) ... to a bitch who won 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 matches ... the only bitch in history ever to be able to do this ... is just preposterous to me.
Tornado was a BEAST ... she was smart, game, tough as nails, could kill you in :12 ... or out-scratch you at 2:40 ... she NEVER got bit down ... not even close ... despite facing world class competition 10x in a row.
Tornado is the one who BIT everything down, 10x in a row.
A mere 4xW is ridiculously unproven compared to Tornado.
IMO, if you took a PRIME Tornado, say after her 3rd fight, I would bet on her to defeat any bitch who ever fought her weight.
As would most of the people who lost to her ...
Jack
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote