I think "action men" also can very easily subscribe to what I have written.
Earl Tudor, for example, made the statement, "I am not betting on his being game, I am betting on his winning."
You don't have to think a dog is dead game to believe he has a shot at winning.
A dog also doesn't have to be dead game to be a great producer either.
Hell, for that matter, what I said applies to EVERY trait a dog can have (mouth/air or any other trait).
NO trait has to be 100% for the dog to be a valuable animal, either as a producer or a performer
Again, I believe providing optimal care benefits both breeders and competitors.
We are definitely on the same page here
No, it is not just you, by any stretch.
This is exactly why I will never put myself in a position to be dependent on dog sales for income again ... it is too easy "to talk yourself into" a sale, and regret it afterward
If I get back in, I will have my income generated from other ventures, and be as selective with who gets my dogs as I am with which dogs I breed together.
Thanks for your input!
Jack








Reply With Quote