Quote Originally Posted by cdj396 View Post
Hey Jack not taking no sides but would like to know what
CJY said about the RB DOG most of my yard is based on them thanks tj

Honestly, amigo, you shouldn't worry about what anyone says, including me.

My dogs haven't produced "the baddest of the bad" either.
A few have with crosses, but NONE of my pure dogs has ever made it to Grand Champion.
Most of my dogs just win when asked to, or sometimes lose, game, with a few not-so-game.

If you like your dogs, and if you're winning with them (or producing winners with them), then what else do you need?

But when you're talking about THE winningest combinations possible, you have to LOOK AT what's putting them out there.

I love the Hollingsworth dogs, but only ONE pure Lady In Red dog ever made Champion.
Most either won (or lost game) on 1 to 2 deals. At most.
But they were absolutely beautiful, absolutely game dogs. Nothing wrong with that.

I believe that the Hollingsworth dogs are the most consistently-game dogs ever, but I don't think they're the "baddest" or "multi-winningest" dogs ever.

There's a difference.

There is no reason for anyone to get mad, kick rocks, or sniffle boo-hoo over the statistical facts that can be harvested here.
They don't make your dogs (or my dogs) "suck" or anything else.
I love my dogs and I am absolutely confident in them beating anything their weight and then some. I am sure you feel the same way about yours.

These statistical tools merely give us quantified information.
From that information, we can all rub our chins and make more informed choices, that's all

Jack