Results 1 to 10 of 398

Thread: Redboy / jocko has made more dead game dogs !

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member waccamaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Conway, South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    416
    Quote Originally Posted by CA Jack View Post
    I am not saying Poncho was one of the baddest dogs ever. But the dog he lost to was another Eli/Carver dog

    Oh, and Poncho outproduced every dog you have

    The dog David TRADED back to me, to get that son of Bud, was Sassy. And I was very glad to get her back.

    If you want to try to make this personal, I can go over a complete history of how my crosses with your stuff did ... and how other crosses and my pure stuff did by comparison.

    Jack
    You comparison is no good you are clearly kennel blind,and I seriously doubt yours and very few others have out produced ours ,and magazines don't mean anything .cover dogs don't mean anything .real production is what means something.it is like this you got let's say 5000 pups out and 1000 make ch the other man 100pups out there and 50 make ch so who is the better producer ,Ray Charles said he could see.
    Jack I don't want you to think I am coming at you cause I am not ,sometimes you take things personel.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by waccamaw View Post
    You comparison is no good you are clearly kennel blind,and I seriously doubt yours and very few others have out produced ours ,and magazines don't mean anything . real production is what means something.
    I am not kennel blind.

    I am not the one who said my general bloodline produces the baddest dogs, or kills the most dogs, that was you

    Poncho produced 59 wins, 11 losses. That has nothing to do with magazines; many of them were just wins/losses out of 1 stud dog who was bred 15x.
    That is real production

    Very few dogs can match that as a producer, including 99% of my own.

    Regarding the subject of "baddest dogs," I think Eli dogs (and Eli crosses) kill the most, quite frankly. And I don't particularly like them
    The reason I don't like them is I don't think they have high % of gameness, but I do respect their accomplishments and give them the credit they deserve.

    Quite frankly, I like RBJ dogs better, as a whole, because I think they're more dependable % wise ...



    Quote Originally Posted by waccamaw View Post
    it is like this you got let's say 5000 pups out and 1000 make ch the other man 100pups out there and 50 make ch so who is the better producer ,Ray Charles said he could see.
    I agree with you.



    Quote Originally Posted by waccamaw View Post
    Jack I don't want you to think I am coming at you cause I am not ,sometimes you take things personel.
    Okay, maybe I was.

    But I have never said my dogs "kill the most" ... or produce "the baddest" dogs ... or that "all the good dogs" have my blood in it.

    I just say my dogs win in as high (or higher) % as anything out there because, WHEN SHOWN, they win 8.7x out of 10 (87%), and they do. Don't think any other line can pass that.
    Now, the wins may not be impressive ... my dogs may have to come off the bottom and out-scratch ... or maybe they're in control the whole time ... whatever they have to do ... they win more a lot than they lose.
    But I certainly don't think they're "the baddest," "the winningest," or that I have a lock on winning.

    But (as you mentioned above) I will compare MY PERCENTAGES with anyone who has ever bred dogs at any time.

    Jack

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •