I am right on everything I said, which is why you have nothing of merit left to say.
If you want to run off and hide, rather than concede YOU were wrong on Chavez, that would be typical of your kind ...
By that I mean, bitch-slapped and pitty-patted, while Hagler couldn't do shit about it.
Um, genius, the fight was a draw.
If you want to again depart reality (you know, the actual cards), and go off of your own, "imaginary card," then we can't have a discussion, because you're talking fantasy not reality.
You show me one professional fight Pernell Whitaker had at super featherweight.
You show me one Olympic fight Pernell Whitaker had at super feather.
Pernell Whitaker won the Olympic Gold medal at LIGHTWEIGHT, genius.
I said not one thing wrong ...
If you are (again) reaching, and talking what weight Whitaker may have fought at "as a teenager" ... then this only goes to prove how DENSE you are ... how LITTLE you can actually stick to what was really being said, and how FAR you are willing to reach to keep avoiding THE TRUTH.
Hell, son, Chavez used to weigh 6 lb ... AS AN INFANT ... but that has not one focking thing to do with what HIS BEST PRIME FIGHTING WEIGHT was
At their PRIME, PROFESSIONAL BOXING WEIGHTS, Chavez was 129 and Whitaker was 135.
When they fought each other, Chavez was 142 and Whitaker was 145.
What focking planet do you live on which prompted you to call Chavez "the bigger man" ...?
Why don't you say something intelligent? Chavez was 55-0. Anyone can look up his record.
Why don't YOU show ME what medal Pernell Whitaker won in the Olympics, and why don't YOU tell ME what weight class?
Why don't YOU show ME what professional junior lightweight fight Pernell Whiaker ever had, genius.
Back up your own lies, or admit you were lying (or that you didn't know WTH you were talking about).
It is actually a habit of the people who argue with me (1) to be unable to spell correctly in the same sentences they're (2) unable to think correctly.
The defects tend to go hand-in-hand
What is not a very good indication of character is you lying to sustain your argument.
Now YOU tell ME what weight Chavez was Champion at for the majority of his career, and retained for 9 title defenses.
You tell ME what weight Pernell won his Olympic Gold in.
You tell ME what weight Pernell began his professional career in.
You tell ME what weight Pernell was, and what weight Chavez was, when they fought each other.
Then YOU admit to ME *which* you were doing, LYING or BEING CLUELESS, in your statement "Chavez was the bigger man" than Whitaker.
Let's see how stout your character is
I have FACTUALLY destroyed you. Let's see if you can admit this.
The only thing you have done is argue your "imaginary boxing card" as to who won the Chavez/Whitaker fight, in defiance of the actual cards
Jack