WHAT WOULD YOU RATHER EAT, A NICE BOWL OF CHICKEN/VEGGIES/RICE OR CEREAL FORTIFIED WITH VITAMINS/MINERALS. ALSO THE AMOUNT OF SHIT AND SMELL OF PISS IS ENOUGH FOR ME DO FEED EM RAW
WHAT WOULD YOU RATHER EAT, A NICE BOWL OF CHICKEN/VEGGIES/RICE OR CEREAL FORTIFIED WITH VITAMINS/MINERALS. ALSO THE AMOUNT OF SHIT AND SMELL OF PISS IS ENOUGH FOR ME DO FEED EM RAW
I gues this link about carbs counts as much here as it thuse where it stands now..
http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...4205#post14205
ps nobody can show of a raw fed conditiond dog !!??. also howmuchs in raw feeding weight would you feed a 55/58 lbs chain/kennel / house dog
Check your email Limey
chek yours jack hahahahaOriginally Posted by CA Jack
Check your email Limey
app. 17oz of food..60 percent meat and 40 percent veggie mix...then adjust based on the individual dog...
http://m1301.photobucket.com/albumvi...b.jpg.html?o=1
This are Norman's Monkey and Norman's Nasty Girl, this photos show two well conditioned dogs fed on raw only.
Unfortunatly the pictures are very tiney and arend focust....
I could send the to you by email, just let me know, thee photos look fine on my device, now that I checked them out in photobucket they do look bad there.
Frosty paws . you need to look at the bigger picture. put antibiotics in meat on google sirch and you see lots and lots and lots of news from years back uptill now consirning the dangers of antibiotics and hormons in meat.and therfor ESPECIALY in RAW MEAT. looking for a specific awnser and upertunatly for a debate with SGC wil not prove your right and his wrong.. take a look at the cheap chicken meat clip. its in dutch but the you tube clips dont need any languish ore sub titels.http://youtu.be/EdhoabewYjc ..
chek this one out maKE SURE YOU LOOK TO AT LEAST 4,15. http://youtu.be/ddqps9NR5ZA
4.000.000.000 of these chickes are produced for europe alone!!! geneticly manipulated, fed up full with massif amounds of antibiotics to make sure NO diseases break out beng so close to another. at 6/7 weeks old they are not only ready to be slaughted. but HAVE to be becuase there harths wil fail. and beat twice as fast as a regular eg laying chiken. there weight wil brake there legs and they die IF they live longer then 7 weeks...on top of that they run so hot that thy are now diveloping geneticly manipultated chickens who do not grow feathers http://youtu.be/8iynbYU_4cA MEANING LESS ENERGY LOSS DUE TO COOLING INSTALATIONS!!. and able to iven MORE chickens on one square yard. wich means more money.. on top of that they get fed prossest meat waist of dead animals . as SGC said you are what you eat.
You can NOT Feed RAW diet CHEAP and get health with it for your dogs!!! . biologicel chicken ore beaf meat etcetera is 3 to 4 times more ecspensif http://www.beefensteak.nl/nl/gevogel...ologische-kip/
And NO you cant bij that stuf at your whole sale markets.
plenty of news about SOLUTED SOIL due to the massif amounds of antibiotics that are drained into it tru urine from life stock... If you feed your own meat and prepear it yourself and whant to stick with your guns then at least cook the crap out of it.... the beter AND CHEAPER alternatif is feeding quality dry kibbel soakt in hot water..
You keep typing the same nonsense.
You still have ZERO actual experience feeding your dogs raw for a long time.
Your problem is with hormones and bacteria, not the concept of raw meats versus kibble. You arguing against raw due to "bacteria" is like me arguing against kibble because of the aflatoxin deaths that have come about in bad kibble batches. So if you want to talk about toxic meat as a strawman, then hell let's talk about toxic kibble. Hell, I would say more dogs have died across the nation from bad batches of kibble than from eating raw. But that still isn't the point.
The POINT is, at its best and purest, raw flesh is the way dogs are supposed to eat their food. Kibble is not. At its best and purest, raw meats/ingredients have more nutrition than they do after being cooked down into kibble. The best kibbled feeds were better before they were cooked! And that is just a fact that you will never get around.
If you want to argue "contamination," and "worst to worst," I would rather feed my dogs raw chicken with salmonella (or a few hormones) than I would to feed a bag of kibble contaminated by aflatoxins. If you want to talk about "best to best," raw food items are still a thousand times more nutritious than what they become when turned into kibble. And, again, that is just something you will never get around.
So why don't you actually feed your dogs the best raw food you can, for a number of months, before you type another word on the subject ... and check back with us ... because you will be singing a different tune altogether.
Jack
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote