Same reason why My Uncle Minor Alldredge got out of the game and I stepped away from it for a while, He says to me all the time, Man I thought the 80's had some POS dogmen I can't even imagine what it's like NOW!!! He said NO THANKS.. 40 years in the dogs was long enough..
Agree with all that has been said.
However, to be fair, I always thought Dwight was a very nice person ... I don't think he did this on purpose.
However, if he and his group are still chattering about what took place 25 years ago, to the extent it was mentioned at his memorial (
) ... and all they remember was the (ahem) "kick" ... and not why it happened ... then I am forced to suspect some bitchassness of sorts.
Because, I can promise you, if someone flat-out kicked my dog in front of me (and it was a legit kick) there would be TWO fights going on, right then, right there
No fucking way any man is going to let some other man kick his dog ... right in front of him ... and say/do nothing
Only way for that to happen is (1) the man is a gutless piece of shit, or (2) the facts were exactly as I said they were, and the man himself made a bad handle, and the other man, me, did NOT maliciously kick the dog, but blocked his ass with a check-type kick with the obvious intent of preventing the dog from taking hold.
And honest man could watch that happen, a check-type kick from the opponent as I described, but only a gutless piece of shit would allow another man to flat-out kick his dog, for no reason, and say/do nothing, but just "whisper about it" years later
That right there should pretty much clear the air of the facts ...
Jack
You know what they say about stories....Is there anyway to read the "facts" or hear the other sides ?
Ps Dewitt was the furthest thing from a thug
You just did read the facts.Originally Posted by postmandan
Since Dwight is dead, you'll have to meet your maker if you wish to read the 'other' side.
Honestly, I would think anyone should be able to reason this out for themselves.
Dwight, not Dewitt.
And I agree, he is no thug.
IF you can read, you will read I said the same thing: he was a nice guy.
A nice guy who failed to make a proper handle. I feel like you lack the capacity to read (or don't bother to read) and assimilate information.
My point is pretty compelling: who on earth would just stand there and let another man kick his dog in the pit?
How could I do this and not get in a fight and/or fouled out?
If you can process basic data, there is no way I could have flagrantly kicked the man's dog maliciously and (1) not been assaulted by Dwight, and (2) not been fouled out.
The only way for my making contact with Dwight's dog with my leg, and NOT getting into a fight, and NOT getting fouled-out, is if the scenario is exactly as I described. Period.
He failed to make a handle, his dog lunged at mine as I was going to my corner, and I checked his ass with a leg BLOCK, not a malicious kick.
Use your brain, and this should all make perfect sense.
Jack
PS: But I guess if you want to believe that, for no reason, I just hauled-off and kicked a field goal with Dwight's dog ... and he didn't do shit about it ... and the referee just sat there and whistled Zippity-Doo-Dah and didn't say anything either ... then you're entitled to believe whatever you want
Why do you get so upset when ppl ask question? I just asked for info to further research the facts from a unbiased perspective. Whats wrong with that? What's perfectly clear from rereading your posts is this is only "your" side of the story and the facts as you seen it....because after all this is your site an your a god here.
Did you win this one ?
How old was Dwight at the time , young enough to fight?
Was Mr. V there ?
The "Thug" coment was direct at another who whipped his ass an formed a opinion after smelling his finger. I just agreed with you. Thank you for providing some facts on this. Always eager to learn more , one can not learn with out asking question , doing research and reading the info available.
Thanks for sharing your time
I am upset because it is ridiculous question IF you think ... (if)
What is unbiased about my question, "How could I not be fouled out?"
Use your head.
Dwight was 25 years younger than when he died.
If he died in his 70s that made him in his 50s.
I am 50, and if someone kicked my dog they would be punched immediately, and continually, until they were unconscious.
I don't know who that is.
Scratch and Stitch were the refs and they would have fouled me out, period, had any "version" other than the one I told been rendered.
We agree Dwight was a good guy.
I guess you must think I am a POS for kicking a nice guy's dog for no reason whatsoever. That is what the OP apparently thinks.
No way would I just kick anyone's dog for the hell of it, period.
It's such an offensive, stupid proposition that I guess it pisses me off and makes me want to kick whoever believes this
I like dogs ... it's people I can't stand
I guess you must think the 6'3" Sratch & Stitch bros were "scared" to foul-out my 5'10" ass when I made the alleged kick ...
You're not eager to learn anything.
You've been given the facts, and you still believe it is "possible" for me to have flat-out kicked Dwight's dog, not had him do anything, not have Scratch & Stitch say anything/foul me out, but to just go on "business as usual."
I am a nice guy too, when in the company of honest, nice people ... but have no patience for malice, stupidity, laziness, etc.
For anyone to actually believe that I committed a flagrant foul like that ... without consequence ... is retarded.
Nobody on earth could get away with flat-out hauling-off and kicking another man's dog in the pit, not even Earl Tudor.
Anyone who believes otherwise is a lifetime retard who "believes whatever he wants" over whatever makes sense.
My scenario (where Dwight missed a handle and I merely prevented his dog from grabbing mine) is not only what did happen, it is the only possible way for it to have happened.
And anyone who believes otherwise (that I somehow flat-kicked his dog and no one did/said anything) is an absolute imbecile, and/or rumor-spreader, with no regard for what is sensible and obvious.
Jack
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
