Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Mouth

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I also know a lady who bred some dogs from Stratton dogs, namely off a bitch she called Rip. The ones I saw didn't take 30 minutes to come unglued, and they were off the Dio Duel/Rip breeding.

    In regards to mouth, it is another trait. If you want to successfully have that, then you have to breed dogs that have that trait ALONG with whatever else it is you want.

    I agree also that hard biting dogs that "try their hardest" to do anything "all the time" will blow out sooner than others as they're putting themselves in a position to quit. The only drawback to that is if that dog is able to get where it wants and utilize what it has, but that goes for pretty much anything.

  2. #2
    That's the same lady I know(Sarah P of PDK) 17 years ago I bought a cold 4 yr old bitch she used to own and I was able to get her cranked up. Well I took her back to their farm to roll her against one of their bitch and I believe it was Rip. Her man the cop said their dogs don't get mad until the :30 minute mark. All their dogs were well behaved and the ones that didn't, they got rid of them. That's how I acquired the supposedly cold bitch's son Amos 1xw1xldg. He was a freak of a bulldog. I won with him over a vet dogman in :18, breaking both shoulders, and it took 3 of us to get Amos out the house. I went and did some time, my brother in law couldn't take care of him and he lost all his cutters. So he sold him. The guys that bought him contract him into Titan, a dog down from Rip. Amos dominated for an hour, he got tired and Titan took over. At the 1:30 mark Amos's turn to scratch, his shoulders we're broken and he crawled over to Titan, mouth, shitted, and died right in the box. When I got out I was able to acquire two offsprings I bred Amos to before I got locked up. One off a grand daughter to Rip and the other off Amos and his dame. Both were Dg dogs. I also heard some of Amos's other offsprings had above average and freak mouth too. That was the last time I had a dog with such powerful mouth. When he had cutters, every dog he bit didn't survive.

  3. #3
    I believe Titan ended up winning another show in close to 3 hours. Her Maggie dog, and her brother Buck, were terrible dogs. Maggie had completely incapacitated every dog she'd ever come into contact with. Funny thing is that Sarah knew shit tons more than her husband. When I was around Sarah a few times with dog dealings, it never took those dogs 30 minutes to get mad. I never did much like her husband LOL

    Rip produced a lot of quality dogs for them bred to a variety of studs. I know I never believed that until I saw a few myself. Seeing is believing.

  4. #4
    Lol. You're right about her knowing more about dogs than her husband. One other skill they had was cropping their dogs ears. They sure got that skill down to the T. Everyone of their dogs had the exact same ear crop and they got some nice looking game dogs. I saw those pair you mentioned when they were young. Sarah told me they were badass dogs but at the time I didn't see any scars on them so I didn't think they were any good. I always wanted to hook up with her to acquire another dog but I lost contact with her.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by OGDOGG View Post
    Lol. You're right about her knowing more about dogs than her husband. One other skill they had was cropping their dogs ears. They sure got that skill down to the T. Everyone of their dogs had the exact same ear crop and they got some nice looking game dogs. I saw those pair you mentioned when they were young. Sarah told me they were badass dogs but at the time I didn't see any scars on them so I didn't think they were any good. I always wanted to hook up with her to acquire another dog but I lost contact with her.
    You're right about the ear cropping. They could do that better than anyone, vets included, I've ever run across. Maggie won once and had trouble from there on out. Buck lost his only show. Maggie produced a decent dog here and there, but those dogs were more inconsistent in what they produced more than anything else.

  6. #6
    Mouth is a trait. That is what you have to remember first and foremost. If you want dogs that have a certain type of mouth on a regular basis, then you have to breed dogs with that type of mouth. If you're inbreeding on dogs that don't have that type of mouth, then it's not something you'll get with any consistent basis. When one dog pops out with the devastating mouth, and if that's what you're really shooting for, then you breed that dog. Whatever dogs come off him with that same or close to the same mouth, you breed those, and so forth and so on through a different breeding combination.

    Eventually, if you're selecting (the major idea) the right dogs, then you'll start to cement that trait more and more.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by FrostyPaws View Post
    Mouth is a trait. That is what you have to remember first and foremost. If you want dogs that have a certain type of mouth on a regular basis, then you have to breed dogs with that type of mouth. If you're inbreeding on dogs that don't have that type of mouth, then it's not something you'll get with any consistent basis. When one dog pops out with the devastating mouth, and if that's what you're really shooting for, then you breed that dog. Whatever dogs come off him with that same or close to the same mouth, you breed those, and so forth and so on through a different breeding combination.

    Eventually, if you're selecting (the major idea) the right dogs, then you'll start to cement that trait more and more.


    Yes there is no argument that mouth is a trait. However, when heavily inbred some lines loose their traits, even when they are all bred around animals with great mouth. This is what I can't explain. Why inbreeding can weaken those very traits you bred for in the first place. Maybe Jack or Evo who has bred a bigger amount of animals know more?

  8. #8
    They don't lose the mouth because they're heavily inbred, at least not as a whole. They lose the mouth because those dogs haven't been selected for that trait for some generations.

    If you take dog A that has a heavy mouth, who is NOT from a line of dogs noted for that, then you're not going to recreate that over and over inside of a few breedings. You have to SELECT that type of mouth over and over to solidify it along the way. Without doing that, it won't ever be where it needs to be.

    If you take dog A that has a heavy mouth, who IS from a line of dogs noted for that and has produced it consistently, breeding dog A to other females that have the same trait will get you dogs like you want.

    If you heavily inbreed on dogs without selecting for that trait, it's going to be lost. That is the key. Selecting dogs with that trait. It's not the inbreeding; it's the wrong selection for the most part.

  9. #9
    I pretty much agree with everything FrostyPaws is saying.

    The people who "lose" the traits they're breeding for only do so because they are not selecting the right individuals to inbreed on. They are inbreeding either on dogs that do NOT have the desired trait and/or on dogs that do not throw that trait.

    Almost without exception, the very best dogs I have ever owned were inbred dogs ... and so, too, have some of the lamest dogs. I have inbred on the wrong dogs before ... and I have also inbred on the right dogs before.

    Further still, even if you inbreed on the right dogs, you still have to be selective in the pups you choose. All inbreeding does is INTENSIFY TRAITS. Some of your inbred pups will have all the SHIT in their gene pool intensified ... while some of the pups will have all of the GOLD intensified ... and so it will be up to you to "flush the shit" and carry forward with the gold

    Jack

  10. #10
    I pretty much agree with everything FrostyPaws is saying.

    The people who "lose" the traits they're breeding for only do so because they are not selecting the right individuals to inbreed on. They are inbreeding either on dogs that do NOT have the desired trait and/or on dogs that do not throw that trait.

    Almost without exception, the very best dogs I have ever bred ad kept were inbred dogs ... and so, too, have some of the lamest dogs. I (like anyone) have inbred on the wrong dogs before ... but unlike many I have also inbred on the right dogs before.

    Further still, and something so many people forget, even if you inbreed on the right dogs, you still have to be selective in the pups you choose. They will not all be the same "genetically." Keeping in mind that all inbreeding does is INTENSIFY TRAITS, a person must remember that some of your inbred pups will have all the SHIT in their gene pool intensified through the inbreeding ... while some of the pups will have all of the GOLD intensified ... and so it will be up to each person to be selective and "flush the shit" and carry forward with the gold

    Jack

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •