THE BADDEST DOGS IN HISTORY

[Buwaya]

I havent viewed the rest of the 11 pages but AJAX comes to mind

[EWO]

Agreed on Ajax. There was a time when he was referred to as the Texas Terror.


Tons of finish.

EWO

[ROCK-MACHINE]

Another from the modern era is Gr Ch Goon Goon (5XW-1XW OTC)...



...and the old man is still healthy as can be seen from his appearance at this years Cajun Classic.

https://youtu.be/bZ6dqZAsBxE

Some other modern era bad asses :

Gr Ch Turbo


Gr Ch Big Whiskey


Gr Ch Eulogy


Gr Ch .22


Gr Ch Steven


Gr Ch Jesse

[Officially Retired]

beat 2 Champions and 1 Gd Champion http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...hp?dog_id=7512

To be honest, I think Joey's win over Gr Ch Texas was bullshit.

I wasn't there, but I did see the video, and Roadblock was a lowdown, dirty, cheating handler ... whose antics (and not anything great about Joey) won the fight that night.

Truth be told, Texas was outclassing the shit out of a one-dimensional Joey, riding his head and making an ass out of the dog ... but every time Texas would wrestle Joey to the floor, Roadblock would yell, "My dog's fanged! My dog's fanged!", and every time Joey would get a break. Why? Because the idiot ref would actually SEPARATE THE DOGS (he's not supposed to!) ... and Joey would not be fanged ... and so after each bullshit, artificial separation (always when Texas was in absolute control and a mile ahead) they would "release" the dogs into each other ... and Joey would hit Texas hard in the chest. (And, quite frankly, Kirkland was an idiot for allowing this to happen, NOT saying anything, and letting his little dog get REPEATEDLY blasted in the chest like that.)

After Joey would hit Texas in the chest, Texas would get him out, and then proceed to outclass the shit out of a basically one-dimensional Joey ... and every time Joey looked like a helpless POS, or went down, Roadblock would once again scream, "My dog's fanged! My dog's fanged!", and every time the idiot ref would break the dogs loose ... get Joey back in the game ... and on every ARTIFICIAL release Joey would get a real deep chesthold on Texas ... and it finally got to the little dog, and he started to wilt ... and Texas finally lost the fight ... basically, he was cheated out of an easy win.

IMO, if Roadblock would have been a good sport, and not a cheating POS ... and if the ref would have known the rules and NOT broken the dogs and called BULSHIT after the first two times he saw there was nothing wrong ... and if Kirkland would have had the nutsack to say something Roadblock ... Texas would have whipped the shit out of Joey , if people would have stayed out of it and let THE DOGS decide the outcome.

So, yeah, Joey has a great "record" ... but, after having seen him go, I don't think he's all that. My opinion is that last deal was nothing but pure BS, and I think Texas was the better dog done wrong.

Jack

[evolutionkennels]

To be honest, I think Joey's win over Gr Ch Texas was bullshit.

I wasn't there, but I did see the video, and Roadblock was a lowdown, dirty, cheating handler ... whose antics (and not anything great about Joey) won the fight that night.

Truth be told, Texas was outclassing the shit out of a one-dimensional Joey, riding his head and making an ass out of the dog ... but every time Texas would wrestle Joey to the floor, Roadblock would yell, "My dog's fanged! My dog's fanged!", and every time Joey would get a break. Why? Because the idiot ref would actually SEPARATE THE DOGS (he's not supposed to!) ... and Joey would not be fanged ... and so after each bullshit, artificial separation (always when Texas was in absolute control and a mile ahead) they would "release" the dogs into each other ... and Joey would hit Texas hard in the chest. (And, quite frankly, Kirkland was an idiot for allowing this to happen, NOT saying anything, and letting his little dog get REPEATEDLY blasted in the chest like that.)

After Joey would hit Texas in the chest, Texas would get him out, and then proceed to outclass the shit out of a basically one-dimensional Joey ... and every time Joey looked like a helpless POS, or went down, Roadblock would once again scream, "My dog's fanged! My dog's fanged!", and every time the idiot ref would break the dogs loose ... get Joey back in the game ... and on every ARTIFICIAL release Joey would get a real deep chesthold on Texas ... and it finally got to the little dog, and he started to wilt ... and Texas finally lost the fight ... basically, he was cheated out of an easy win.

IMO, if Roadblock would have been a good sport, and not a cheating POS ... and if the ref would have known the rules and NOT broken the dogs and called BULSHIT after the first two times he saw there was nothing wrong ... and if Kirkland would have had the nutsack to say something Roadblock ... Texas would have whipped the shit out of Joey IMO, if people would have stayed out of it and let THE DOGS decide the outcome.

So, yeah, Joey has a great "record" ... but, after having seen him go, I don't think he's all that. My opinion is that last deal was nothing but pure BS, and I think Texas was the better dog done wrong.

Jack

Agreed

[ragedog10]

To be honest, I think Joey's win over Gr Ch Texas was bullshit.

I wasn't there, but I did see the video, and Roadblock was a lowdown, dirty, cheating handler ... whose antics (and not anything great about Joey) won the fight that night.

Truth be told, Texas was outclassing the shit out of a one-dimensional Joey, riding his head and making an ass out of the dog ... but every time Texas would wrestle Joey to the floor, Roadblock would yell, "My dog's fanged! My dog's fanged!", and every time Joey would get a break. Why? Because the idiot ref would actually SEPARATE THE DOGS (he's not supposed to!) ... and Joey would not be fanged ... and so after each bullshit, artificial separation (always when Texas was in absolute control and a mile ahead) they would "release" the dogs into each other ... and Joey would hit Texas hard in the chest. (And, quite frankly, Kirkland was an idiot for allowing this to happen, NOT saying anything, and letting his little dog get REPEATEDLY blasted in the chest like that.)

After Joey would hit Texas in the chest, Texas would get him out, and then proceed to outclass the shit out of a basically one-dimensional Joey ... and every time Joey looked like a helpless POS, or went down, Roadblock would once again scream, "My dog's fanged! My dog's fanged!", and every time the idiot ref would break the dogs loose ... get Joey back in the game ... and on every ARTIFICIAL release Joey would get a real deep chesthold on Texas ... and it finally got to the little dog, and he started to wilt ... and Texas finally lost the fight ... basically, he was cheated out of an easy win.

IMO, if Roadblock would have been a good sport, and not a cheating POS ... and if the ref would have known the rules and NOT broken the dogs and called BULSHIT after the first two times he saw there was nothing wrong ... and if Kirkland would have had the nutsack to say something Roadblock ... Texas would have whipped the shit out of Joey , if people would have stayed out of it and let THE DOGS decide the outcome.

So, yeah, Joey has a great "record" ... but, after having seen him go, I don't think he's all that. My opinion is that last deal was nothing but pure BS, and I think Texas was the better dog done wrong.

Jack.... I do not agree with those tactics was it cheating or great handling seeing how the ref let go and the opponent never spoke up?

[Officially Retired]

Jack.... I do not agree with those tactics was it cheating or great handling seeing how the ref let go and the opponent never spoke up?

That is a very simple question to answer:

Great handling = great tactics displayed that are WITHIN the rules

Cheating = getting away with bullshit NOT accepted within the rules

So you can answer your own question on the Joey matter, I am sure

[Officially Retired]

Jack.... I do not agree with those tactics was it cheating or great handling seeing how the ref let go and the opponent never spoke up?

We can go on down the line with your question:

If I get away with stealing weight at the scale, is that "great handling" or is it cheating?

If I get away with feeding your dog acepromazine in a burger bit, by putting it out where I tell you to "walk your dog" before the show, was that "great handling," or was it cheating?

If I get away with bumping my dog on his turn to go, which prompts him to scratch, is that "great handling," or is it cheating?

Cheating = cheating
Which means getting away with something you're NOT supposed to do.

By contrast, truly great handling would be me catching my dog up from the bottom, on a split-second out of hold, getting the scratching started ... and your dog failing to scratch ... and me winning with the bottom dog thanks to my LEGAL handle.

Is is called GREAT handling, precisely because IT WAS POSITIVE ... 1) it took speed, 2) it took skill, 3) it took savvy and experience to spot the right moment, and most importantly, 4) IT WAS ALLOWED within the rules of the contest ...

To call ANY form of cheating "great" anything is to SPIT ON the word, "great."

Cheating = lowdown, dirty bullshit ... and there is nothing "great" about it.

Jack

[Nut]

We can go on down the line with your question:

If I get away with stealing weight at the scale, is that "great handling" or is it cheating?

If I get away with feeding your dog acepromazine in a burger bit, by putting it out where I tell you to "walk your dog" before the show, was that "great handling," or was it cheating?

If I get away with bumping my dog on his turn to go, which prompts him to scratch, is that "great handling," or is it cheating?

Cheating = cheating
Which means getting away with something you're NOT supposed to do.

By contrast, truly great handling would be me catching my dog up from the bottom, on a split-second out of hold, getting the scratching started ... and your dog failing to scratch ... and me winning with the bottom dog thanks to my LEGAL handle.

Is is called GREAT handling, precisely because IT WAS POSITIVE ... 1) it took speed, 2) it took skill, 3) it took savvy and experience to spot the right moment, and most importantly, 4) IT WAS ALLOWED within the rules of the contest ...

To call ANY form of cheating "great" anything is to SPIT ON the word, "great."

Cheating = lowdown, dirty bullshit ... and there is nothing "great" about it.

Jack

Very good post