Well, thank you for noticing, and that is what this place is for: reasoned, mature dog talk.
Inflammatory language, and the refusal to see the good in other lines, makes having a reasonable and productive discussion between fanciers impossible.
That said, it is human nature to talk-down our opponents ("X football team rules/"Y" football team sucks, etc.). In fighting, people have styles that they like, and styles that they dislike, and again it is human nature to play-up what we like and down-talk what we don't like.
However, when a little maturity and perspective is gained, it has to be admitted that all legitimate lines produce winners and losers, great dogs and lousy dogs (as do different mixes). Same thing with all styles. I do believe some lines produce more lousy dogs than good dogs, while other lines produce more good dogs than lousy dogs, but within those extremes there are still good and bad in all bloodlines. (Again, same thing with all styles.) In the end, with a little maturity, there can simply be appreciation for "rival bloodlines" doing well. That is called good sportsmanship, and this can only happen in a civilized environment
We all have our biases and our prejudices, and it is easy to get caught up in them and say things we shouldn't, but in the effort to sincerely call ourselves "bulldog fanciers" keeping an open mind to the effectiveness of lines/styles different from our own preferences, and an honest eye on other people's dogs, is always better than the reverse.
Jack
PS: Jack Kelly had a funny article in the old Journal years back called, "That's My Dog Syndrome," which was one of the funniest pieces on dogman kennel blindness I have ever read![]()