Humaniacs at it again.

[Officially Retired]

I think you are confusing the whole higher standard bit of elected officials with "employees". Elected officials are there to represent their constituency. An employee is there to collect a paycheck for services rendered. This guy is an employee.

Good point.

I also think HSUS and PETA are being confused with Fish & Game, who are very much pro legal hunting. In fact, legal hunting and fishing is what they encourage as well as regulate.

I did not confuse the two, I merely used HSUS as an example. Anymore than I confused Civil Liberties with HSUS in my other example.

However, the point of Fish & Game regulating hunting is excellent, and was previously addressed and conceded. Point made, and I agree.

If I enjoy hunting and I like to eat doe meat instead of buck meat, I am going to go to Montana where you can get a doe permit, I am not going to illegally hunt does in California. Same deal here with this fellow, and it really is as simple as that. Forget who his employer is.

Again, point conceded.

The humaniacs who are against hunting period, are trying to make an issue out of this where there is not one. Apparently they are having a modicum of success, even with the bunch of miscreants we have in our little community here too.

Anything for publicity

As far as controlling the people population thing, that too fits right in with the humaniac agenda, or the Red China communist agenda, but suit yourselves.

Well, this is a whole other subject now, that really belongs in the philosophy section of the board, and with which I vehemently disagree. You can put "humaniac," "Red China," or "communist" labels on the very real matter of human overpopulation, but they are merely refusals to look at the most massive problem facing the world to day. It could properly be argued that the pathology of just accepting the status-quo, doing nothing, and instead just labeling any effort to change things as "communist" is without question the worst agenda of all.

There are vast open spaces all over this country, and the world.

Have you ever actually looked at the statistics of how much raw land is left now, compared to two decades ago?

Have you ever actually looked at the statistics as to how fast the human population is growing?

Have you ever actually looked at the statistics of how many species of animal have become extinct, are going extinct, and are predicted to be extinct within the next 10 years?

It is all staggering.

I do think that too many unfit people are allowed to breed today, which is a whole different topic than outright population control. That borders more on Eugenics, which is another slippery slope when taken too far, but a little of it would be a good thing. Been to WalMart lately? :-o

I do agree with this, absolutely.

Jack