I agree with everything you just said, QCK23.

Essentially, this proposed "law" (idiocy) could properly be translated thus:

"We grant you the right to be completely irresponsible with your dogs; we don't care if they get hit by cars/cause accidents; we don't care if your dog hurts someone else's pet, property, or child; all we care about is that you have the right to 'let your doggie go free' ... just so long as you cover your ass with some insurance, in case he f***s $#!^ up."


That is essentially what this proposal says: who cares about the ramifications to other innocent people, so long as an insurance company can cover it with a check.

Jack