Quote Originally Posted by YigYang
i agree with what you just said.
This brings me to a thought that i have been trying to get a great explaintion for.
Based on scientfic facts that a animals bite force is impacted and contributed by the animals jaw stucture, jaw muscles, and weight.
but how can this be if there bite force in 100% genetic.
For example lets you Bass Tramp Redboy.
redboy was a pretty good 52lbs dog that had a good size head, and jaw structure but lacked mouth(a hard bite)
Since he threw that trait into his offspring they lacked mouth as well as i have understood. Therefore they wanted to add mouth to the redboy dogs so they cross it with a Jocko dog that was known to have a great mouth(hard bite) who was matched between 46lbs- 48lbs.
Yes it might be true that there Mouth is 100% genetic, then we are proven science false
Proving science false? I think you just need to really comprehend what you're reading.

  • 1) If an animal's bite force is based on jaw structure, jaw muscles, and weight(??) ... are you trying to say that "training" affects basic jaw structure and muscle structure?
    2) If Redboy dogs don't have mouth (genetically), and if you have to add Jocko blood to them to give them mouth (= add different genetics), where are you extrapolating the idea that "training" is affecting mouth performance?

In other words, why don't you just "train" Redboy dogs to bite harder, if conditioning is all that's required to get it? Why are you having to breed different genetics into them to get mouth?

Jack

.