That is how I always thought, as a breeder.
However, as sort of an historian since concocting this site, and after crunching the numbers, being involved in a DOY selection ... and spending enough time NOT breeding dogs ... I am starting to think that dogs with the potential ought to have that potential realized.
Also, I am starting to pull my head back far enough from "the trees" of my own bloodline to see the forest of all lines ... and what combinations have produced multi-winners more frequently than others.
Again, that is how I have always looked at things, from a breeder's standpoint, as well as a "he proved he's a bulldog" standpoint.
Even from a realistic standpoint, a dog that really had to show a lot of gameness is typically shot after that. It's not really fair to make them have to do that again.
Again, I have always felt this way to an extent.
As a breeder, I didn't need to have Silverback "win" ... I knew he had winning traits. Winning 1 or 10 wasn't going to make his sperm any better.
However, as mentioned, from the point of view (now) as sort of a record-keeper and historian, I wish I would have given him (Stormbringer, Icon, and some others) the chance to go all the way.
Strictly from the standpoint of breeding, I knew all I needed to know to make effective breeding decisions.
However, regarding the history of the sport, and and REALLY seeing if they could take their place in history, and where they'd stand, I didn't even think about that before.
I sure do now ...
Jack