Early Starter v Slow Starters

[Officially Retired]

Well those are two different subjects: schooling properly versus the ability (resources) to school properly.

Like I said, most people roll a dog 1-2x, then match. But they are hardly matching "schooled dogs."

I agree with the fact there are "naturals" ... dogs that seem to be an ace on their first rolls.

So too, there are dumb dogs that can never improve.

However, there is also a middle ground (where most dogs fall in), which are dogs that progressively get better, and develop their styles, as they get exposed to different styles.

Poncho was a front leg/chest dog when I first rolled him ... but by his 4th roll he was on the head.

Jack

[Frank43]

Well those are two different subjects: schooling properly versus the ability (resources) to school properly.

Like I said, most people roll a dog 1-2x, then match. But they are hardly matching "schooled dogs."

I agree with the fact there are "naturals" ... dogs that seem to be an ace on their first rolls.

So too, there are dumb dogs that can never improve.

However, there is also a middle ground (where most dogs fall in), which are dogs that progressively get better, and develop their styles, as they get exposed to different styles.

Poncho was a front leg/chest dog when I first rolled him ... but by his 4th roll he was on the head.

Jack

Is there any correlation between slow or late starters and intelligence?