Originally Posted by gotap_d
I was not wrong about anything.
You said dog hair weighs 5 oz but have no evidence to support this.
I said I do not believe shaved bulldog hair would weigh even that.
Even if it did, I said 5 oz isn't shit and affects nothing.
In post #32 of this thread, you said, if two equals faced each other, the one with the 5 oz wight advantage would win "100% of the time," which is laughable.
Now, you're denying saying this, which not only makes you laughably-wrong, but a dishonest liar, even when your own words have been posted here for all to see.
You then attempted to compare a 5 oz weight advantage in dogs to a 15-lb weight advantage in humans (also on post #32 of this thread):
I am not "nitpicking" for pointing out the fact your comparison is invalid ... the truth is your comparison WAS SO FAR OFF it simply demanded correction, as 15 lb is 48x more weight than 5 oz.
I correctly pointed out THE FACT that humans are, in general, only 4x bigger than dogs, and here is my PROOF:
The lowest weight male dog I know of being matched is 26 lb, which when multiplied x4 = 104 lb.
Coincidentally, the lowest human fight division is Mini Flyweight, which limit is 105 lb, exactly 4x greater.
The largest legit match dogs I know of being matched are 59-60 lb, pit weight, which when multiplied x4 = 240 lb.
Coincidentally, the HIGHEST you will EVER see truly competitive boxers fight at as Heavyweights will never exceed this amount either, which again is exactly 4x the weight of the largest, legit Catch Dogs.
Therefore, as stated, humans are about 4x the size of pit bulls, and this is true from the smallest to the biggest. I simply picked a 40 lb "middleweight" bulldog, and compared it to a 160 lb middleweight human fighter, but (as demonstrated) the truth of what I said obtains across the board, from the smallest to the lightest: the 4x ratio applies.
Therefore, you trying to compare a 5 oz advantage in a dog to a 15 lb advantage in a human fighter (a 48x greater disparity, not 4x), was SO FAR OFF that I had to correct the amazing stupidity/cluelessness of your opinion, and point out THE FACT that 5 oz in a 40 lb dog translates to 20 oz (1.25 lb) in a middleweight 160 lb human fighter (using the universally-true 4x standard).
Smaller bulldogs will have less hair, larger bulldogs will have more hair, but THE RATIO will remain the same
I merely tried to screw your head on correctly, but you are resistant to reality. I then showed you how ridiculous your argument is, using real numbers.
With the real numbers in place, and with a realistic sense of proportion used (1.25 lb), if you are still trying to suggest that a 160 lb middleweight has "an advantage" over a 158.75 lb middleweight, then yes, I am calling you an idiot. It is a negligible, nothing weight disparity in the middleweight division ... and, when scaled-down 1/4 to 40 lb bulldogs, I am saying that a 5 oz weight advantage of a 40 lb dog over a 39.7 lb dog (the proportional equivalent), is likewise a negligible, nothing weight disparity as well.
You can "deny" this all you want, but denial isn't rebuttal, it is only denial
Everything you have said so far has been false, exaggerated, and has indicated a total misunderstanding of basically every single concept that is possible to talk about as it pertains to this subject. I am trying to keep things REAL, with real numbers, accurate proportions, and sound concepts ... while you invent pure, fabricated bullshit out of thin air, grossly exaggerate, and then deny the silliness of the things you've said previously.
At the end of the day, what *I* have said is the truth:
A 160 lb middleweight has no appreciable advantage over a 158.75-lb middleweight, and no sane fight analyst/trainer would think so either.
And likewise, a 40 lb bulldog has no appreciable advantage over a 39.7 lb bulldog, and no sane dogman would think so either.
As I have said repeatedly (as well as some of the others), Other Factors are going to be the determining causes of who wins/loses, not the negligible weight difference
Again, you can "deny" this if you want, but denial isn't rebuttal, it is only denial.
Jack
Reply With Quote