As someone who has handled "evidence," and built court cases for the insurance industry for nearly 3 decades, the two most compelling factors of crime are (1) opportunity and (2) motiveOriginally Posted by Black Hand
People get arrested and questioned all the time, based on these two factors, so (if this was an indictment against VR) and if VR had the motive and opportunity, he would at the very least be brought in and questioned (if not arrested) for being "the receiving beneficiary" of someone else's demise.
While it may be premature to "convict" him of the allegations at this point, and while many of the "facts" may well prove to be baseless allegations, certainly there seems to be enough "circumstantial evidence" to support his being called into question about it
Whether he ultimately gets convicted, or exonerated, of being called into question is a whole other issue.
Jack
Reply With Quote