
Originally Posted by
Kimo615
Hold up! I don't owe anybody anything! They have no proof of my stud EVER doing anything or not doing anything! That's hear say! It's none of their damn business either! And they bred to my stud before they ever knew a damn thing about him. So accomplishments is not why they bred to him. I can prove that to! Jack, you have no proof of his accomplishments either for that matter. And Jack, I didnt lie about crap. I told you one stick took place, but...there no proof that mother welped those pups! Now, how am I supposed to say they are off my stud when I never seen a smidgen of proof? He refused to send that proof, then lied to me and the registry about the pup count. And he breeds staffs? That causes confliction with the entire thing. Here's the bottom line, I have proof of everything I accuse them of. So why don't you email me Jack and get that proof before you say I owe you or them any thing???? You are hearing their story...but is a damn lie! You want the truth? Email me. And for you to say my studs accomplishments are a lie because of word of mouth by these fools is bullshit.
You are @$$uming the story is a lie.
The FACTS are:
YOU lied TO ME and said the breeding NEVER took place
You now admit that the breeding DID in fact take place;
YOU lied about your stud's exploits;
THEY lied and did not pay you the fee;
Yet they STILL say their pups are off your stud.
My own view is the statistical probability of them still admitting their pups are off a paper-tiger (if it really isn't) is pretty low ..
Whereas the statistical probability of YOU lying appears to be pretty high, in general (especially if you didn't get paid for your stud service) ...
In point of fact, there IS a way to prove all this; it's called a DNA test.
But, since I doubt there is enough cooperative spirit between yall, my opinion as to what stays here is the final judgment.
Since "weighing evidence" is something I have done probably longer than you've been alive, my judgement is is this: a) since you admit the breeding happened, and b) since they are admitting their pups are off a paper tiger = the pups are in all probability legit ... ESPECIALLY if their date of birth is roughly 63 days after the breeding they did to your paper tiger 
Jack