I am upset because it is ridiculous question IF you think ... (if)
What is unbiased about my question, "How could I not be fouled out?"
Use your head.
Dwight was 25 years younger than when he died.
If he died in his 70s that made him in his 50s.
I am 50, and if someone kicked my dog they would be punched immediately, and continually, until they were unconscious.
I don't know who that is.
Scratch and Stitch were the refs and they would have fouled me out, period, had any "version" other than the one I told been rendered.
We agree Dwight was a good guy.
I guess you must think I am a POS for kicking a nice guy's dog for no reason whatsoever. That is what the OP apparently thinks.
No way would I just kick anyone's dog for the hell of it, period.
It's such an offensive, stupid proposition that I guess it pisses me off and makes me want to kick whoever believes this
I like dogs ... it's people I can't stand
I guess you must think the 6'3" Sratch & Stitch bros were "scared" to foul-out my 5'10" ass when I made the alleged kick ...
You're not eager to learn anything.
You've been given the facts, and you still believe it is "possible" for me to have flat-out kicked Dwight's dog, not had him do anything, not have Scratch & Stitch say anything/foul me out, but to just go on "business as usual."
I am a nice guy too, when in the company of honest, nice people ... but have no patience for malice, stupidity, laziness, etc.
For anyone to actually believe that I committed a flagrant foul like that ... without consequence ... is retarded.
Nobody on earth could get away with flat-out hauling-off and kicking another man's dog in the pit, not even Earl Tudor.
Anyone who believes otherwise is a lifetime retard who "believes whatever he wants" over whatever makes sense.
My scenario (where Dwight missed a handle and I merely prevented his dog from grabbing mine) is not only what did happen, it is the only possible way for it to have happened.
And anyone who believes otherwise (that I somehow flat-kicked his dog and no one did/said anything) is an absolute imbecile, and/or rumor-spreader, with no regard for what is sensible and obvious.
Jack






Reply With Quote