You just did read the facts.Originally Posted by postmandan
Since Dwight is dead, you'll have to meet your maker if you wish to read the 'other' side.
Honestly, I would think anyone should be able to reason this out for themselves.
Dwight, not Dewitt.
And I agree, he is no thug.
IF you can read, you will read I said the same thing: he was a nice guy.
A nice guy who failed to make a proper handle. I feel like you lack the capacity to read (or don't bother to read) and assimilate information.
My point is pretty compelling: who on earth would just stand there and let another man kick his dog in the pit?
How could I do this and not get in a fight and/or fouled out?
If you can process basic data, there is no way I could have flagrantly kicked the man's dog maliciously and (1) not been assaulted by Dwight, and (2) not been fouled out.
The only way for my making contact with Dwight's dog with my leg, and NOT getting into a fight, and NOT getting fouled-out, is if the scenario is exactly as I described. Period.
He failed to make a handle, his dog lunged at mine as I was going to my corner, and I checked his ass with a leg BLOCK, not a malicious kick.
Use your brain, and this should all make perfect sense.
Jack
PS: But I guess if you want to believe that, for no reason, I just hauled-off and kicked a field goal with Dwight's dog ... and he didn't do shit about it ... and the referee just sat there and whistled Zippity-Doo-Dah and didn't say anything either ... then you're entitled to believe whatever you want
Reply With Quote