Quote Originally Posted by CA Jack View Post
I disagree completely that "the better dog won" between Jeep and Homer ...

I can think of a lot of great dogs who lost only because their weight wasn't right, they were brought in underweight/bad condition, etc.

That said, I very much do agree with the general idea of DOY being a title of Most Accomplished dog of the year ...

However, isn't showing extreme, 100% dead gameness an "accomplishment" ... arguably even the most important accomplishment?

Is winning/losing the only relevant criteria?

Jack

PS: You didn't answer my question about the title BULLDOG of the Year ... if that has an added implication of "proven gameness" to it?
Homer should have never met Jeep, but he did and he lost.

That is another argument in of itself, managers of fighters making poor decisions.

As far as extreme gameness being an accomplishment, I don't know if I'd say that necessarily as an accomplishment is defined as a performance. Does one perform gameness or display it?

To answer the question of "Bulldog" of the year...I'll say it's splitting hairs or playing into ones interpretation vs. anothers.

I believe we are both right in our own minds, I don't think there is an absolute answer therfore it is all subjective.

S_B