StopEm, if everyone used the breeding database, as it should be used, I agree it would remove the need for paper registration.

A picture's worth a thousand words, and photos of the breeding, mama on pups, individual photos of all the pups, all under the control of the breeder are worth tens of 1000's more than "paper documents" printed by folks a thousand miles away who can only go off the word of the breeder anyway.

If more people watched the Add Breedings Tutorial, and implemented that, the more they would "get" the idea behind this place and realize how much more efficiently it was set up ... if only people had the mental wherewithal to read, and follow instructions, before the set about adding/misspelling/duplicating every dog that pops into their heads.

The thoughtful user, who takes the time to do everything correctly, will come to enjoy INVESTING his time adding dogs/breedings here ... where all of the statistical data are hooked-into a fully-functional system ... rather than wasting their time adding dogs/pups, where you can't harvest a single meaningful fact about the dogs you enter. The other systems aren't setup that way

Between the breeding database, the dog database, our unique Search Features, as well as our Statistics Cruncher, no other APBT Resource compares ... not by a longshot.

Jack

PS: At some point, we are going to add a second photo (mama on pups) as you suggest. Good idea