View Poll Results: Are Cheap Pups Good for the Breed?

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes. Low $$ reflects an honest, working-man price and target market.

    16 35.56%
  • No. Selling cheap pups is a disgrace to the breed, and to yourself, to sell at "newspaper" prices.

    29 64.44%
Results 1 to 10 of 73

Thread: $200 PUPS = GOOD "WORKING MAN" PRICE ... OR A DISGRACE TO THE BREED???

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Hushman View Post
    Breeding a high priced average,cold or cur is bad though.That's what fucks up the breed we all luv.U c it all the time!!!!I understand where ur coming from but at the same time u have to stop n c the negative is greater.All ur hard work could go down the drain when a dude breeds an unworthy animal just to get his coin back
    That is all theoretical bullshit ... and exactly the opposite of the truth.

    The only way my hard work has gone "down the drain" is when people have LOST my good dog, not "bred" my dogs they "didn't check."

    The funniest part about the insanity of what you believe is that my two WORST producers when I got out were my "HARDEST-checked" (Pup Pup and Super Red).

    Being "hard checked" has NOTHING to do with producing ability. You simply have no idea WTH you're taking about.

    I could produce better dogs with "unchecked" dogs of my line than most people could produce with "hard checked" scatter-bred mutts.

    Jack

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by CA Jack View Post
    That is all theoretical bullshit ... and exactly the opposite of the truth.

    The only way my hard work has gone "down the drain" is when people have LOST my good dog, not "bred" my dogs they "didn't check."

    The funniest part about the insanity of what you believe is that my two WORST producers when I got out were my "HARDEST-checked" (Pup Pup and Super Red).

    Being "hard checked" has NOTHING to do with producing ability. You simply have no idea WTH you're taking about.

    I could produce better dogs with "unchecked" dogs of my line than most people could produce with "hard checked" scatter-bred mutts.

    Jack
    its not about being checked hard it is about being looked at period. if someone continually breeds dog that have never shown there skills then you will eventually not have working dogs ne more.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by bolero View Post
    its not about being checked hard it is about being looked at period. if someone continually breeds dog that have never shown there skills then you will eventually not have working dogs ne more.
    Very true. Skills are what need to be evaluated mostly (all without ever making a bad move), because if a person is not evaluating their dog's skills ... it will show up in their win record (or lack of win record) ... even if they're "testing hard."

    Just because people buy cheap dogs from people, and those cheap pups happen to turn out, doesn't mean cheap pups are "more likely" to turn out.
    It pretty much means they got lucky ... or they knew the guy.
    And just because people pay high $$ for pups, that don't turn out, doesn't mean "all" high $ pups don't turn out.
    It either means they got unlucky or it means they can't tell the difference from a quality pedigree and a 'pretty' (but empty) pedigree.

    The bottom line is, MOST people who are smart enough to have/breed good dogs, that are significantly more likely to turn out, are also smart enough to know that their dogs are therefore worth more than what's being put out there by the average guy.

    Jack

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •