DEBATE ON DEX / SOLU-DELTA / CORTICO-STEROIDS

[Officially Retired]

Assumption is the mother of all fucks ups.

Assumption is especially "the mother of all fuck ups" when assuming a man who's been in dogs about as long as you've been alive is "wrong" ... when in fact you're the one who's wrong

You're not going to learn any methods before trusting and understanding them. Its better to ask questions when you don't. Nothing can go wrong if you do that.

Asking questions is a great thing to do.
Coming off like an arrogant prick is not.

The audacity of telling me to take down all my "wrong information," when in fact you have no understanding of the subject, is almost unbelievable.
Telling me to issue "a public retraction" to everyone, because you THINK I'm wrong is much different from "asking a question"

You need to recognize the difference, and you need to learn how to actually ASK a question, rather than PRESUMING "you must be right" ... "just because you're YOU"

You might be surprised to learn I have thoroughly researched this subject ... long before you have ever owned a dog ... and the medics that have been involved in helping me were all topnotch.

That said, I WELCOME new information ... I WELCOME updated drug/dosage information ... I WELCOME honest, thoughtful questions

But I'll be damned if some relative newcomer is going to "insist" that I issue a public retraction of my WELL RESEARCHED article because HE THINKS my dosages are too high

It might be helpful for you to ASSESS YOUR OWN KNOWLEDGE before you go to questioning mine

I am sure there are things you know, that I do not, but I promise you it's 'not much' on the subject of these dogs

Just slightly if you question it in the wrong manner and piss of Jack.

It's not about "pissing me off"; it's about being an unbelievably rude, presumptuous ass to me, when I have done as much (or more) than any other dogman on the planet to provide the best CRITICAL information on these dogs that can be gathered. It would be a very short list of "names" in this game to jot down those who have taken the time to put out as much good information as I have over the years. If you could even write one name.

It would be helpful to keep that in mind while you're asking me your "questions"

There is a difference between asking questions, clarifying points, and just flat calling a whole body of information "wrong," and demanding a retraction, all based on your imagination, without citing an actual fact to stand on.

My apologies to Jack for bringing it up in that manner. But that was in private and i wouldn't have state it like that if I created the tread.

Apology accepted and, as I said in private, in the end we're on the same side

Like i said in my first reply I will be happy if correct information is in the article when everything is said and done, even it remains the same. There's a few tweaks, I learned (understand) something new, and I bet some others did too. Cheers.

The information was already correct, but adding the dosage range was a good result, I agree.

I just wish the whole thing would have been gone about differently.

There's a few tweaks, I learned (understand) something new, and I bet some others did too. Cheers.

I am sure everybody here learned something new, including me.
(I bet even ol' Frosty is pilfering some Solu-Medrol right now as we speak )

Let us both, in the future, remember we're on the same side

If I have made any mistakes, it is not because I am a dumbass, or didn't research, etc.

It's because, like anyone, I make a certain amount of errors and omissions too ... but try my best not to make too many

Jack