Now Regarding Hagler vs. Chavez ... and which one was FACTUALLY the better fighter, pound-for-pound ...

Here are THE FACTS:

Hagler was 62-3-2 (67 fights total / 93% wins / 78% KOs) at his best weight;
Chavez was 55-0-0 (55 fights total / 100% wins / 84% KOs) at his best weight;

Hagler was 62-2-2 when he faced Leonard, at his own best weight, yet he lost, and then quit boxing altogether;
Chavez was 87-0-0 when he faced Whitaker, 3 weight divisions over his best, he got a draw, and kept fighting and winning afterward;

Hagler's best weight was 158
Leonard's best weight was 147

Chavez' best weight was 129
Whitaker's best weight was 135

Hagler LOST to a naturally 11-lb smaller man;
Chavez DREW to a naturally 6-lb bigger man;

FACT: Chavez moved up in weight class, to Lightweight, NEVER lost, and DESTROYED everyone he fought there too;
FACT: Hagler never moved up in weight class, lost 3x and drew twice, in his best weight class;

FACT: EVERYONE who beat Hagler was his same size, or smaller; and so he never risked moving up;
FACT: NO ONE Chavez's size ever beat him;
FACT: NO ONE the next weight class up, Lightweight, ever beat Chavez either;
FACT: The only losses Chavez ever suffered were 2-3 weight divisions above his best, after he had NEARLY 90 FOCKING FIGHTS WITHOUT A SINGLE LOSS!!!

FACT: Chavez had a better record, on every level, any way you want to slice it, than Hagler did. Period.

So now, you tell me "why" ... what OBJECTIVE FACTS you have in your hand ... that could possibly place Hagler over Chavez pound-for-pound ... and what OBJECTIVE FACTS made you say Chavez was "the bigger man": than Whitaker

Jack

Bottom Line: So, no, you don't know how to think accurately ... so let me turn the light on for you