Last post, well said. Some of the best dogs in the world went for peanuts. Some of the crappiest dogs out there have won thousands. The bottom line is that quality and amounts wagered have little to do with one another. Seen it both ways.

Is the big money guy obligated in any way to lower his wage to afford the opportunity to another who does not have his cash flow? Absolutely not. Will it leave questions to be answered, yes, but there is no obligation to answer those questions.

It is basically, "it is what it is'. Lots of opinions and thoughts on the subject, but no real obligations. EWO