Quote Originally Posted by skipper View Post
Well its kind of hard to argue with the choices. Chicos dogs have won sdj doy 4 years in a row. ch carmela soprano 2010, gr ch chilindrina 2011, gr ch copperhead 2012 and now ch siega 2013. Siega beat the almost unbeatable ch dentista for her championship. There will always be controversy on the choices as its one persons opinion. But to say the dogs given the title aren't worthy is just hating. Records speak for themselves. I have no agenda, nor am i close to chico but i believe to give credit when credit is due.

I am not sure what "almost unbeatable" means. (I have a feeling it means nothing.)

The truth is, every undefeated Champion = unbeaten.
Therefore, what makes a win over the previously-unbeaten Ch Dentista any more valuable as a win over 2 previously-unbeaten Champions?

I must admit, I can't stand Chico, but I have no problem giving credit where it's due (if it's due).
The trouble I am having is justifying what makes a 3xW (who beat 1 Champion) a more worthy candidate than a 6xW (who beat 2 Champions)?

I understand that "public perception" might be one Champion was more "highly-regarded" than another (again, whatever that means), but on sheer numbers and statistics I don't see the justification.

Jack