Regarding Champions losing their titles, if they eventually lose, I understand your thinking, but you're confusing boxing Championships with dog titles ... they're not the same thing. Dogs earn titles for breeding purposes; human fighters "become Champion of the world" according to SANCTIONING BODIES (like the WBC), who preside over everything, and we have no such sanctioning bodies in our sport.Originally Posted by Icedogger
The title "champion" in dogs is for proof of worth ... it is NOT designed to be "held onto and defended" over years.
Although, technically, I am a "Jack K" too (Originally Posted by Icedogger
), and could create some unity in the sport, the trouble with creating a sanctioning body and "giving out titles" is that some lawmakers might call that "organizing and promoting" an illegal activity ...
That is not logical. If you say a dog "must" fight at least a 1xW, then how does ANY dog get to start its career, if a match against him "doesn't count?"Originally Posted by Icedogger
If two first-timers start out, and one of them wins, he is a 1xW ... or are you saying that his win over another first-timer "shouldn't count?" If that is what you're saying, it is preposterous and would never fly.
Now, I agree that a Championship should be earned by beating at least a 1xW, a 2xW, or (ideally) another Champion ... but a taking your first-timer (or 1xW) and beating a first-timer shown by a good dogman is a legitimate win, again for a fellow first-timer or a 1xW.
Jack
.




  ), and could create some unity in the sport, the trouble with creating a sanctioning body and "giving out titles" is that some lawmakers might call that "organizing and promoting" an illegal activity ...
					
					
					
						
  Reply With Quote