Sb if you never said i slandered anyone why mention my name along with slander in the post, and believe me you do not threaten me at all , its my feeling that i threaten all of the ones who dont see to good from their rose coloured glasses they been wearing or from having their nose so far up their heros ass they cant see the wood for the trees . You see i stoped hero worshiping a long time ago, so now i can defend and also disagree with the dogmen i looked upon as the best , are they are only humans ,and that i can tell you was the best thing i ever did , as it allowed me to question things that untill then i took as gospel .Originally Posted by S_B
Projectx, I didn't accuse you of slander, but you obviously felt threatened by the comment.
I don't look to breed dogs with structural defects, if a minor defect pops up, such as slipped hocks for instance, as mentioned here earlier. I would over look it, if most everything else I was looking for in that particular animal was in place.
Gamedogs, who are performance bred are not without defects, as "structure" is not the main focus. Form follows function in most all working breeds, ours is no different.
I would be more inclined to read all of your lengthy posts, if you were actually discussing what you as a breeder has contributed breeding your own dogs. And what superior qualities your dogs bring to the table, instead of what someone else's does not.
And you completely misunderstood me about correctly represented and entered pedigrees as pertains to this database. I haven't turned a blind eye at all when it comes to this, as I want the TRUTH entered here as well as recorded elsewhere. Not sure how you would have come to that conclusion AT ALL.
I have actually corrected some of your data entry in this pedigree database.
I am glad that you dont look to breed faults as a rule and i agree with you sb that these animals are not without defects ,and of course its unavoidable to not breed dogs with some minor defects , but i was talking more particualry about dogs with more severe defects either physicall or in the case of gary hammonds , using deaf dogs , so im certainly not saying that we can never breed dogs with minor defects , that would be an ideal world scenario which we do not have .
Your comment about you being more inclined to read all my lenghty posts if i was discuusing what i had as a breeder myself contributed to the breeding of my own dogs seems a rather strange think to say, as when i come on to the forum to read threads on what might interst me , i dont wonder whether the person posting it is either an expierienced breeder or dogfighter the psot normally tell me that ,but i read the post and i ether agree or disagree or think it has some merits or not depending on how i see things like everyone else does on any given subject. .Just like i would have made that comment to you, i would just reply to your post giving you my opinoin on what you posted in your first post , which was obviuosly meant for me as you mentioned my name and as such i replied to it never using the age old comment that you used , about wanting to know what you have done as some sort of reason to not have to agree with me or accept i have a point which you can agree or disagree with , as under those circumstances only about 5 % of all peoeple who ever post on any subject in these forums be it jacks or any other would not be allowed to say shit , regardless of how much sense it made or not , is that what your saying sb?
I dont have to tell you about me or my dogs or what i breed , just like i dont ask you, i look at what you or anyone else may reply to any given subject , and if i ,like many others think they have a point about that they post a reply to it , i dont need to know if they have been there seen it done and got the t shirt for me to read it, i read it and i dont decide to agree or disagree with its contents on the basis of who posted it or how deep they been , i read it and if it makes sense i say it and if it dont agree i say that to , this isnt a pissing contest sb cos if you been around as long enough you knwo that sometimes the one that can piss the farthest aint always right .Sb i will give your post the same respect i do to all the others i read , by at least reading them and deciding whther i agree or not based on whats written in it and reply to, not reply to it by whether my feeling got hurt cos it says something about a line or dogman i like , thats childish bullshit , so if you dont want to read my posts thats fine but lets not start a pissing contest ok .
As for me misunderstanding you , well im gald , as your original post seemed to be against anyone having an opinion be it right or wrong ,and that we should say nothhing and stick toggether , but as i told you, i wont stick toggehter with someone ideas if i dont agrree with them , thats riddiculous , so i mentioned and hoped that if a subject like ped faking comes up that you would not feel that we should just say nothing , and im glad you dont feel that way on that sb and i will gladly stick toggehter with you on that subject sb.
As for my data entry , what exaclty have you changed , as although i myself being only human i can and do occasionaly get things wrong , i would be interested on what data is incorrect in my peds , thank you.
Reply With Quote
