J. Carver's Satchmo stud dog

[CYJ]

Ditto Jack. If to many feel other wise. Put it back to off Iron Head. Do not wish to create a lot of arguing problems. I no longer have my older Pete Spark's books. Seems Iron Head was around in the Early to late 60's. Later on in the late 70's and 80's, would see dogs shown right up off Iron Head. But the dog by then was long dead. In my Chuck dog's pedigree, Iron Head was back there 4 or more generations which made more sense. We have to walk in today's sunshine. Probably half of all our pedigrees are wrong way back there some where. The Dibo line has always been popular. But if you have the older books and read about some of the dogs used. Many had quit but bred any way.

I have seen recent pedigrees that are very impressive and not saying they are not true. Then I would see some with lots of dog men names unknown to me. When traced far enough would see a good blended family of good dogs that was popular in my time era. Where they show up in the generation line up makes more sense. Example would be the McCool -Young-Thibodeaux blood lines. If the dog man named Young was a white guy and from Texas. May have been some kin. Some of the Young family settled in Texas. LOL

The Cardenas, Morfin dogs having been crossed with Fontenot and Creel dogs I like. That dog called Mac-11's Goat, in it's 14 generation study keyed to Boudreaux' Blind Billy 2062 times. May not mean much, but to me was very impressive.

The only consistent bred dogs over time that appeared to have the paper work correct. Was the Colby dogs and the Heinzl dogs. A lot of individuals who kept it straight today had to start with their own personal yard. One was my good friend Tar Heel Matt. There are many like yourself and other dog men posting on here that have as well. Cheers