???
I am not following your logic.
First of all, you did say Wilder's dogs. (Go read your own post.) You stated you want to give props to "Wilder's dogs," but you posted an example of a dog that has nothing to do with Wilder at all to headline your kudos.
Now, after this is pointed out, you want to honor "all the dogs" from Wilder's period??? This is ludicrous.
First of all, I believe Wilder lived for 90+ years, so that would involve honoring damned near every APBT that breathed the air last century, lol, and second I seriously doubt that "most were good dogs." In fact, how could you even know if dogs you've never laid eyes on were good or bad?
I know that there is a certain attraction many dogmen share for the OFRN dogs, but IMO a more sensible post would be to honor Wilder's good dogs and then to post a photo of an example of one with an invitation for others to post more
Jack