All dogs descendants of wolves???

[CYJ]

Book of James Chapter 3 verse 7 says; For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed and has been tamed of mankind.

Ecclesiastes Chapter 1 verses 8-11 says; All things are full of labor; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing. The thing that has been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there anything whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it has been already of old time, which was before us. There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.

By the time era at the Tower of Babel. I would think there were many types of animals being used for food, work, hunting, protection, and even for pets etc. From this dispersion of the known peoples of that ancient time; by God's confusion of the one language to many languages,(Genesis 11: Verses 6-7). The first 70 Nations were formed as these tribal groups moved across the land and resettled in various regions of the earth.

With them I feel they already had various types of dog breeds along with many other work, food type beasts etc. Through selective breeding; for what ever needed use of their dogs were. Certain foundation types of dogs over time became established. Like Scent hounds, Coursing Hounds, Mastiff types, Terrier types, and so on.

So I think all dogs come from some sort of dog type beasts that existed before the Great World Wide Flood and was preserved on the Ark. The Wolf, Fox type beasts was on that Ark as well. The dogs were dogs, wolves were wolves, foxes were foxes, lions were lions and Tigers were Tigers and so on.

Some may think we are the smartest races of Mankind today and have greater Technology than any peoples of past History. But we just got off the Horse to riding a automobile etc. say 100 to 75 years ago. Daniel the Prophet said only in the last days of man kind would knowledge be greatly increased. Today some say it is doubling every six months. You may also note that the language barrier has been greatly broken down. That is my thoughts and I am sticking to it. LOL

[BlackHeartWarrior]

that all comes back to the fact that they say dog is from the wolf family. But todays studies suggests that dogs are more like pigs then wolfs genetically.

[Black Hand]

that all comes back to the fact that they say dog is from the wolf family. But todays studies suggests that dogs are more like pigs then wolfs genetically.

what study is this, cuz dogs are like 99.9% genetically the same as a wolf.

[evolutionkennels]

that all comes back to the fact that they say dog is from the wolf family. But todays studies suggests that dogs are more like pigs then wolfs genetically.

Compare dna of dog with a wolf. Then do the same with a dog and a pig....


Drumroll....... Wolf!

[Black Hand]

yeah im searching and do not see anything that relates dogs to pigs lol

[ToTheDogs]

Here's the thing.... If you run a wolf's dna and pitbull's dna, you're correct Evo, they WILL look the same BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH DOGS! If you run your DNA and my DNA, will it not state, "THEY ARE BOTH HUMAN." ???? I'm sure it would. And when they compared DNA from Dog Breeds to Wolves.. "DNA was extracted and genetic distance for mitochondrial DNA was estimated between individuals".. So, estimating works as SCIENTIFIC FACT now?!


The paragraphs you posted and the link that you posted are ONLY theories. There is ZERO proof to their argument.

"We think the skull isn't that of a domesticated dog, because it had big teeth"

HOW STUPID DOES THAT SOUND? You think with the amount of money they are being donated to do this research they would've come to a better conclusion that that.

[evolutionkennels]

Here's the thing.... If you run a wolf's dna and pitbull's dna, you're correct Evo, they WILL look the same BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH DOGS! If you run your DNA and my DNA, will it not state, "THEY ARE BOTH HUMAN." ???? I'm sure it would. And when they compared DNA from Dog Breeds to Wolves.. "DNA was extracted and genetic distance for mitochondrial DNA was estimated between individuals".. So, estimating works as SCIENTIFIC FACT now?!


The paragraphs you posted and the link that you posted are ONLY theories. There is ZERO proof to their argument.

"We think the skull isn't that of a domesticated dog, because it had big teeth"

HOW STUPID DOES THAT SOUND? You think with the amount of money they are being donated to do this research they would've come to a better conclusion that that.

If they are both dogs, then there is no argument

[Officially Retired]

For that matter, I believe we humans are at least 96-99% genetically the same as Chimpanzees ... so "a lot must happen in that 1-4% difference"

At least with some people

[evolutionkennels]

For that matter, I believe we humans are at least 96-99% genetically the same as Chimpanzees ... so "a lot must happen in that 1-4% difference"

At least with some people

Yes, we share a common ancestor. Furthermore, all of us humans have about 2% neanderthal blood.... EXCEPT for Africans. Those of us that migrated couldn't help ourselves and had to have some hairy neanderthal puntang as we migrated out of Africa and ran into our other species hominids from a common ancestor. Furthermore, another sparse population in the Tibet area has about 1% davonian dna... Yes, an all together different species of humanoid with whom we also share a common ancestor. It is with great caution and doubt that I would say that a pig is closer to a dog than dog is to a wolf. Breed a horny dog to a pig in heat... No offspring. Breed a dog to a wolf and voila.... A hybrid. Same can be said with neanderthal and human.

[waccamaw]

Sounds logical to me .