You actually are the one saying I said things that I didn't.
First you say I am giving dogs "human" emotions, when I didn't (there's no need as they have dog emotions).
Now you're saying that I believe my conclusion is "the same" as a dog wagging its tail, but I didn't say that either
My conclusion does not have to be "the same" in order to be accurate. If I have a dog that is a barking, hole-digging freak outside ... but is calm and doting when brought inside ... I can form the very realistic deduction that the animal just wanted to be indoors with me.
You can disagree with my conclusion, but I am neither ascribing "my" emotions to the animal, nor do I have "no reason" to conclude what I've concluded. Quite frankly, I have every reason to believe as I do and no reason to believe any differently.
Jack