Should Showing EXTREME GAMENESS be Part of DOY Candidacy?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ragedog10

I'll go with CH.Lotto he took what most would not and would of been then all night long.

---

Was that in 2014?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stopem

I always thought that gameness was the name of the game but if he look at it in this sense then Hallie Berry should've been considered

---

Who did she beat/time?

Extreme Gameness should qualify a dog for DOY status, due to the trickery. One should also add more titles so that the level of honesty is balanced as well. If not a lot of key things will continue to go unnoticed.

Split dead even at 13/13

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pit Bull Committed

I would also cull one that is game to the bone but lacks mouth, ability, stamina, intelligent, etc.

---

Never would I do such a thing. If a dog shows the will to never quit, regardless of what happens to him. He deserves to live in my book. JMO

GLOBAL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pit Bull Committed

A truly elite dog may never be put in the situation where it had to show heart...so I believe having two separate titles would be best.

---

I agree 100%

GLOBAL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MWA

Never would I do such a thing. If a dog shows the will to never quit, regardless of what happens to him. He deserves to live in my book. JMO

GLOBAL

---

Yeah, this guy Pit Bull Committed needs to be committed.

He speaks about breeding top quality animals "through culling" ... but I'm not sure if he's ever actually bred a top quality, Champion-defeating animal =;

As best as I can tell, hard-culling produces nothing ... only breeding decisions produce dogs.

No one that I know of, who actually has bred top-quality animals, culls exceptionally-game dogs.

That is the mark of an idiot/dog-butcher, but not a dogman.

I do agree that ability is certainly important, of course it's important, but dogmen treasure gameness above all else ... you don't kill exceptionally-game dogs.

Jack

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MWA

I agree 100%

GLOBAL

---

I'm with this also and if gameness comes into account with elite dogs on the grand stage with eachother. We all still will be looking more at the Grand stage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CA Jack

Was that in 2014?

---

Yes it was.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ragedog10

I'll go with CH.Lotto he took what most would not and would of been then all night long.

---

Gets my vote too