Do you think it would be possible to keep this dispute CIVIL and FACTUAL?
The point I am most concerned with, as a database owner, is if the breeding is LEGIT or not :idea:
Who owes whom "what" is a secondary
consideration to the reality of how the dogs are bred.
With that said, these are
the facts I have been able to decipher:
1) The breeding is legitimate;
2) Kimo lied about the exploits of his stud;
2) Hueblot/Rolltide lied, and never paid Kimo the stud fee, because of his lie about phony record of his stud.
IMO, the lies about the exploits of the stud do
not justify the action of withholding payment for the stud.
If the buyer(s) of the stud service failed to do their due diligence, that is their own fault.
However, the fact Kimo didn't get paid for his stud service doesn't justify Kimo's lie TO ME saying the breeding is "fake." :angry:
BOTTOM LINE: 1) Kimo owes ME an apology for his lie to me, 2) Kimo owes Hueblot/Rolltide an apology for his lie to them about what his stud has done, and 3) these two guys owe Kimo his pup/payment for the stud service.
That's how I see it,
Jack