Over the years the Wilders dogs have made there marks in history lets give these solid dogs some love for rich old school blood.
http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...p?dog_id=16011
Printable View
Over the years the Wilders dogs have made there marks in history lets give these solid dogs some love for rich old school blood.
http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...p?dog_id=16011
How in the world are you calling this a Wilder-bred dog?
It isn't even remotely ...
Did not say Wilders bred just dogs from Wilders period is what I am talking bout they are mostly good dogs in my opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by CA Jack
???Quote:
Originally Posted by realpitsnobull
I am not following your logic.
First of all, you did say Wilder's dogs. (Go read your own post.) You stated you want to give props to "Wilder's dogs," but you posted an example of a dog that has nothing to do with Wilder at all to headline your kudos.
Now, after this is pointed out, you want to honor "all the dogs" from Wilder's period??? This is ludicrous.
First of all, I believe Wilder lived for 90+ years, so that would involve honoring damned near every APBT that breathed the air last century, lol, and second I seriously doubt that "most were good dogs." In fact, how could you even know if dogs you've never laid eyes on were good or bad?
I know that there is a certain attraction many dogmen share for the OFRN dogs, but IMO a more sensible post would be to honor Wilder's good dogs and then to post a photo of an example of one with an invitation for others to post more :)
Jack
Ok mr jack this is your site and I am sure I will not win this but here goes u said woods red boy has no thing to do with Wilders when he did the breeding http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...p?dog_id=16011 ???? Now do you call this a vise grip dog you did this breeding http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...php?dog_id=674 right. 2nd you sd post a good dog I did not know you knew anything bout woods red boy to say if he was good or not and last I said my opinion that's means good to me and just like u don't like all the dogs I like I am sure I will not like all the dog u like that's why I said in my opinion
Hello again.
Which Wilder are you talking about?
This WILDER http://www.thepitbullbible.com/forum...hp?dog_id=6343Quote:
Originally Posted by CA Jack
Okay, then I have no idea why you posted the previous dogs you did, as they have nothing whatsoever to do with Jake Wilder. There is another Wilder in TN, Rockbottom Kennels, that I think you are confusing for Jake (based on your peds).
Jack
PS: Also, yes, I call my Wild Red Rose a "Vise-Grip Dog," precisely because I bred her, I bred her parents, and I owned 3 out of 4 of her grandparents. That is not the case with Jake Wilder and any of the the first several pedigrees you posted, which is why I asked you the questions I did.
If your talking about Jake Wilder , he was nothing more then a puppy peddler ... He did absolutely NOTHING in terms of preserving the traits all dogmen have come to respect and admire in GameDogs. Jake was a fancier of the Old Family Red Nose families , but that's where it ends .